PROTESTING AGAINST HASHEM
Torah reading—Genesis 18:1-20:24
Haftarah—II Kings 4:1-37
When we study a haftarah,
first we want to understand the theme of the prophetic passage. Next we want to
understand how that theme relates to the theme of the Torah reading. This week’s haftarah consists of two narratives from the life of Elisha, the
prophet Elijah’s disciple and successor. The first tells how he enabled the
widow of a prophetic disciple to rescue her children from being sold into
bondage by creditors, and the second tells how he promised a childless woman
she would have a son, and then resurrected the son after the child died.
How
does the first narrative relate to the events of this week’s Torah
reading? At first glance, it doesn’t;
what does this have to do with the birth of Isaac, the expulsion of Hagar and
Ishmael, the fall of Sodom and Gomorrah, Abraham’s covenant with Abimelech, or
the Binding of Isaac? (1)
The
answer relates to the way our Sages of blessed memory understood the
destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. Last
week we read that the plain of Sodom used to be extremely fertile. This led the people of the cities to become prosperous
but unforgivably greedy. Rabbinic midrashim (2) describe the ways that the
residents of Sodom and Gomorrah displayed utter contempt for the virtues of
charity and hospitality. But the
Prophets repeatedly speak out for the needy, and nothing says a haftarah can
only include a reading from one book; why did the Sages choose this narrative? The key lies in the verb, “to
cry.”
In the Torah Hashem informs Abraham that He is
about to destroy Sodom and Gomorrah for their corruption. Hashem precedes the death sentence with the
words, “The cry of Sodom and
Gomorrah is very great, for its sin is very serious.” Rabbi Sir Jonathan Sacks, a major figure in
the Orthodox Jewish movement, identifies the Hebrew Bible as the first “protest
novel” in the history of the world. Here
Abraham actually haggles with the Creator of the Universe for the cities He
wants to destroy. Abraham’s words of
protest are both courteous and bold:
“shall not the Judge of all the earth do justly?” A biblical commentator named Arnold Zweig
summarizes this interchange beautifully.
”Do you think…that Hashem did not know that there were not even ten
righteous men in Sodom? But Hashem
wanted our father Abraham to show whether he was a man or no; and didn’t he
show himself a man!” In our Haftarah, the widow “cries out” to the Prophet for
help. Selling the children of a
destitute widow may have been permissible according to the letter of the law,
but absolutely wicked according to its spirit.
The
account of the Binding of Isaac portrays Abraham’s utter steadfastness when
told to offer up the very son that Hashem had promised would produce children
beyond counting. Yet it is also seen by
every viewpoint in Jewish thought as a protest:
a protest against the practice of human sacrifice. Jewish lore says nothing about Abraham’s
internal mood on his way to the place Hashem would show him, but nothing
prohibits imagining that he was filled with agony, either. In fact, I find it hard to imagine anything crueler
than a parent who feels no sadness or outrage at the prospect of losing a
child. The woman whose miraculously
promised son dies is quite open with her grief and rage against Elisha, and
perhaps against Hashem as well, and who can blame her? So Elisha silently endures her protest, as
silently as Abraham journeys to the altar, and then brings her son back from
the dead. I have to admit, though, I
haven’t found an answer to one important question. Why did the child have to die in the first
place?
(1)
We have a hint at the outcome of this narrative
in Hashem’s command, “raise him up for an offering,” not “slaughter him” or
“sacrifice him.” In Judaism we also see
the lesson that Isaac’s acquiescence in being bound for a sacrifice shows that
Hashem sees offering one’s life to Him is equivalent to laying it down.
(2)
Midrash (plural Midrashim): a homily or exegesis, derived from the word
for “To search.” Midrashim are meant to
impart a moral or psychological lesson suggested by the text, rather than an
article of faith.
No comments:
Post a Comment